Course feedback survey builder
Short, research-backed questions for the middle or the end.
How sure can you be when 12 of 18 learners say a lesson was clear? Get the honest range for any yes/no question, NPS with its margin of error, the average of 1–5 ratings, and how many answers you need.
Free, no sign-up. Nothing you type leaves your browser.
Agreed, found it clear, would recommend…
Everyone who answered the question
67% likely 44%–84%
Most of the group, give or take 20 points.
A rough direction, not a verdict: the likely range is wide.
Training groups are small: 8 to 30 people is typical, and not everyone answers. With 18 answers, one person changing their mind moves the result by more than 5 points. So “67% found the lesson clear” really means “somewhere between about 44% and 84%”. Report it that way and nobody rewrites a lesson, or celebrates, on the strength of two answers.
The range comes from the Wilson score interval at 95% confidence. It behaves well where the textbook formula breaks down: with few answers, and with results near 0% or 100%, where the textbook formula can give a range below 0% or a range of zero width.
You ran the same workshop for two groups. In group A, 12 of 18 said they could explain the topic to someone else (67%, likely 44–84%). In group B, 9 of 20 said so (45%, likely 26–66%). The ranges overlap from 44% to 66%, so the difference may be chance. That doesn’t mean “do nothing”: look at what the lesson asks and where people said they got stuck, and check again with the next group after you’ve changed it.
Net Promoter Score subtracts the share of detractors from the share of promoters, so it carries the uncertainty of both. With 20 answers its margin of error is around ±34 points. Most course NPS figures are reported without that margin, which is how a group “drops 20 points” without anything having changed. If a client asks for NPS, give it with its range. If you’re choosing the question yourself, a yes/no question after each lesson or a labelled 1–5 rating at the end gets more answers and says more.
Below 5 answers, nothing: report the count only. From 5 to 10, say it in words (“about half”, “most”) rather than as a percentage. From around 30 answers a share is usually within ±15 points, which is enough to compare one group with the next. A margin of ±5 points needs about 385 answers, more than most courses ever get.
It is how far the result could be from the true value for everyone like the people who answered, 95% of the time. This calculator uses the Wilson score interval, which stays honest with small groups and results near 0% or 100%, unlike the textbook “±1.96 × standard error” formula.
It’s popular, but it’s noisy for small groups: with 20 answers the margin of error is about ±34 points, so a score of +30 could just as well be −4 or +64. For a course, the share who say “yes, I could explain this to someone else” after each lesson, or a 5-point rating with a range, tells you more for the same effort.
With fewer than 10 answers a single person moves the result by more than 10 points, so a percentage looks more precise than it is. Words keep everyone, including you, from reading too much into it.
Calculate the range for each group. If the ranges overlap a lot, the difference may be chance. If they barely overlap or don’t, the difference is probably real. With small groups, compare the same question asked at the same moment, for example at the end of the same lesson.
No. The calculator runs in your browser; nothing you type is sent to a server or saved.
Chalkenso is where courses are designed and improved: instructors note what happened on the exact passage, learners say where they got stuck, and AI drafts the next version for you to approve.